2010 BMW 335 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 BMW 335. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 BMW 335 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2010 BMW 335. (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 335.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (625 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 335. (600 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 335.
Compare all specifications:
2010 BMW 335 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 335 | XK |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 600 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4624 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1811 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1384 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2752 mm |