2010 Cadillac BLS vs. 1991 Acura Integra
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (179 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1991 Acura Integra. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1991 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Cadillac BLS | 1991 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | BLS | Integra |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.1 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
