2010 Cadillac CTS vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1988 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Acura Integra.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Cadillac CTS | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | CTS | Integra |
Year Released | 2010 | 1988 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4867 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1504 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |