2010 Cadillac CTS vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Cadillac CTS | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | CTS | Epica |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 302 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4867 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1504 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
