2010 Cadillac DTS vs. 2012 BMW X1
To start off, 2012 BMW X1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Cadillac DTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Cadillac DTS would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2012 BMW X1. (176 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW X1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 253 kg more than 2012 BMW X1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac DTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW X1. (350 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW X1.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Cadillac DTS | 2012 BMW X1 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | DTS | X1 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5273 mm | 4454 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1798 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1463 mm | 1545 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2936 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |