2010 Cadillac SRX vs. 2011 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2011 Cadillac SRX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Cadillac SRX would be higher. Both 2010 Cadillac SRX and 2011 Cadillac SRX are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 265 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 302 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Cadillac SRX | 2011 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | SRX | SRX |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6950 RPM | 6950 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5100 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1916 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4834 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1669 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2807 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 79 L |