2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, both 2010 Chevrolet Camaro and 2010 Nissan Pixo were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP) has 236 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 304 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4836 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1918 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1377 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2852 mm | 2360 mm |
