2010 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2011 Lada Niva
To start off, 2011 Lada Niva is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2011 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2011 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 290 kg more than 2011 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Lada Niva. 2010 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 2011 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 2011 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Chevrolet Epica | 2011 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
| Model | Epica | Niva |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 137 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 19 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |
