2010 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz. (91 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Chevrolet Matiz | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Matiz | Epica |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 995 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
