2010 Chevrolet Orlando vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Chevrolet Orlando would be higher. Both 2010 Chevrolet Orlando and 2012 Chevrolet Orlando are equipped with a 2,384 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 174 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are all wheel drive (AWD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 232 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Orlando | Orlando |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2384 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6700 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4652 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1836 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1633 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
