2010 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2011 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2011 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Tahoe | UTE |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |