2010 Chrysler 300 vs. 2001 Honda Passport
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Honda Passport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Honda Passport would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Honda Passport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Passport (190 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Chrysler 300. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Passport should accelerate faster than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Because 2010 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (257 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Chrysler 300 | 2001 Honda Passport | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 300 | Passport |
Year Released | 2010 | 2001 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 256 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4999 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1882 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3048 mm | 2710 mm |