2010 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2011 Opel Antara
To start off, 2011 Opel Antara is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 2,404 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Opel Antara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2011 Opel Antara. (138 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Antara.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Antara. (220 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Antara.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Citroen C-Crosser | 2011 Opel Antara | |
Make | Citroen | Opel |
Model | C-Crosser | Antara |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2404 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |