2010 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (121 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Daihatsu Sirion | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Sirion | XC90 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.7 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |