2010 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, both 2010 Ford E-150 and 2010 Ford E-250 were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2010 Ford E-150 and 2010 Ford E-250 are equipped with a 4,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 265 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 339 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford E-150 | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4717 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1925 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1702 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2824 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |