2010 Ford E-350 vs. 1990 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1990 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Falcon.
Because 1990 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Falcon (235 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford E-350 | 1990 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-350 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2010 | 1990 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 3157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4437 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2800 mm |