2010 Ford E-350 vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford E-350 | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | E-350 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | CVT | Manual |