2010 Ford E-350 vs. 2012 BMW X6
To start off, 2012 BMW X6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X6 (244 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2012 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X6 (600 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford E-350 | 2012 BMW X6 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | E-350 | X6 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 600 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4437 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1983 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 85 L |