2010 Ford E-350 vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (318 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford E-350 | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | E-350 | Rexton |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4437 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |