2010 Ford E-350 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Impala (296 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Impala (355 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford E-350 | 2013 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | E-350 | Impala |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 355 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | CVT | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4437 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1851 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1491 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2807 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.9 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |
