2010 Ford Ecosport vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M (298 HP) has 231 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford Ecosport | 2013 Mercedes-Benz M | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ecosport | M |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1400 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4804 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2915 mm |
