2010 Ford Expedition vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Expedition. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Expedition would be higher.
Because 2010 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford Expedition | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Expedition | Leaf |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5245 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2002 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1961 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3023 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
