2010 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2010 Ford F-150 and 2010 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-150. (292 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (433 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 2010 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford F-150 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-150 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 433 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
