2010 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Ferrari FF HELE
To start off, 2013 Ferrari FF HELE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford F-150 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2013 Ferrari FF HELE.
Because 2013 Ferrari FF HELE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford F-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ferrari FF HELE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2013 Ferrari FF HELE has manual transmission. 2013 Ferrari FF HELE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford F-150 | 2013 Ferrari FF HELE | |
| Make | Ford | Ferrari |
| Model | F-150 | FF HELE |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5885 mm | 4907 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2004 mm | 1953 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1887 mm | 1379 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3670 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 91 L |
