2010 Ford F-150 XLT vs. 2010 Ford F-150 FX2
To start off, both 2010 Ford F-150 XLT and 2010 Ford F-150 FX2 were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2010 Ford F-150 XLT and 2010 Ford F-150 FX2 are equipped with a 4,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 292 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 433 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford F-150 XLT | 2010 Ford F-150 FX2 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | F-150 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 433 Nm | 433 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2352 kg | 2352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5885 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2004 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1887 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3670 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 98 L |