2010 Ford F-350 vs. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Daewoo Tocsa would be higher. At 5,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-350 (300 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2010 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford F-350 | 2006 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Ford | Daewoo |
| Model | F-350 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5398 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
