2010 Ford Falcon vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (430 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Ford Falcon. (387 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. (489 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford Falcon | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
Model | Falcon | Vantage |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 387 HP | 430 HP |
Torque | 520 Nm | 489 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4967 mm | 4382 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1868 mm | 2022 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1433 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2838 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |