2010 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP) has 161 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford Mustang | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | Mustang | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
