2010 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi TT weights approximately 93 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger. 2012 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford Ranger | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Ranger | TT |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1447 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5171 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1684 mm | 1349 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3193 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |