2010 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Ranger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Volt weights approximately 268 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford Ranger | 2012 Chevrolet Volt | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ranger | Volt |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1447 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5171 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1684 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3193 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 35 L |
