2010 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford Ranger | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Cruze |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5171 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1684 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3193 mm | 2685 mm |