2010 GMC Savana vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Savana weights approximately 662 kg more than 2012 Volvo C70.
Because 2010 GMC Savana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 GMC Savana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Savana (452 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C70. (350 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2010 GMC Savana | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Savana | C70 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 452 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2402 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5692 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2017 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2073 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3429 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |