2010 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 GMC Sierra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Sierra weights approximately 872 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 GMC Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Sierra (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2010 GMC Sierra | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | GMC | Mini |
Model | Sierra | Countryman |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 565 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5839 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2032 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1875 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3645 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 47 L |