2010 GMC Terrain vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 GMC Terrain is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 GMC Terrain is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Terrain weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 GMC Terrain. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 GMC Terrain | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Terrain | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4707 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1849 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2858 mm | 3010 mm |
