2010 Holden Barina vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Barina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Barina. (197 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Barina | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Barina | Commodore |
Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |