2010 Holden Colorado vs. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Colorado would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Caddy. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Caddy.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy (250 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2012 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Colorado | 2012 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Colorado | Caddy |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 250 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |