2010 Holden Commodore vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden Commodore | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Commodore | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
