2010 Holden Commodore vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Commodore.

Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: