2010 Holden Cruze vs. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Cruze would be higher. At 2,000 cc, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan (168 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan (350 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2012 Volkswagen Sharan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden Cruze | 2012 Volkswagen Sharan | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cruze | Sharan |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4597 mm | 4854 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 1904 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1477 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 2919 mm |
