2010 Holden Cruze vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Cruze would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP) has 355 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (625 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (320 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden Cruze | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | Cruze | XJ |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 503 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4597 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1477 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 3157 mm |
