2010 Holden Epica vs. 2005 Scion xB
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Scion xB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Scion xB would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Scion xB. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Epica | 2005 Scion xB | |
Make | Holden | Scion |
Model | Epica | xB |
Year Released | 2010 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 142 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |