2010 Holden Epica vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden Epica | 2012 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Holden | Opel |
| Model | Epica | Combo |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
