2010 Holden Epica vs. 2012 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2012 Renault Trafic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Renault Trafic. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Epica | 2012 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Epica | Trafic |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 241 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |