2010 Holden UTE vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden UTE | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | UTE | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
