2010 Holden UTE vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Tundra. 2003 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden UTE | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | UTE | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
