2010 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2012 Renault Trafic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden UTE would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 257 more horse power than 2012 Renault Trafic. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Trafic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden UTE | 2012 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | UTE | Trafic |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 357 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 241 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |