2010 Holden UTE vs. 2013 BMW 3 Series
To start off, 2013 BMW 3 Series is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 3 Series (296 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (281 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 3 Series should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW 3 Series (407 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2013 BMW 3 Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden UTE | 2013 BMW 3 Series | |
| Make | Holden | BMW |
| Model | UTE | 3 Series |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 296 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
