2010 Holden UTE vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (200 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden UTE | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | UTE | 3 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |