2010 Holden UTE vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden UTE would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 237 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Cube.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden UTE | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | UTE | Cube |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 357 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
