2010 Honda Civic vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (148 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Honda Civic | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Honda | Ford |
| Model | Civic | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
